Beware Of The Ben
Jun. 8th, 2003 10:19 pmI'm intrigued by all this... personally, I'm always quite complimented when people hit on me... and unless we were at a fetish club, I'd expect it to be done in much the way this was (i.e. express some vague interest in the person you're chatting up, then pop the question at them) rather than just starting out with "So, fancy a shag?", which seems to be what
So, where was I going with this? Oh yes... question: if being approached as a potential shag in a pub or club, would you prefer the 'Hi, how are you/do you come here often/what's your sign/etc?' approach, or the 'Hi, wanna fuck?' approach?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 02:39 pm (UTC)Generally though I'd want to talk to them for a bit first, in case they turn out to be boring.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 02:46 pm (UTC)*smiles at you sweetly*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:02 pm (UTC)I do think it's bad manners to pretend to like someone for the sole purpose of getting them into bed.
At the very least, if a guy has started a conversation it would be polite for him to finish it before going off to ask somebody else for a shag, rather than acting as if a woman ceases to exist if she doesn't want to have sex with him.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:05 pm (UTC)The other way doesn't work at all for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:14 pm (UTC)E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:19 pm (UTC)Oh, I know it could be argued that I encourage people to do so at events like the Calling, but in the main most people there have the ability to think above that.
I don't casual shag uninteresting people, so I suspect getting me interested would be far more effective than the 'wanna fuck' option.
All utterly hypothetical, of course...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:20 pm (UTC)I'd feel complimented if someone wanted to talk to me.
I'd feel complimented if someone wanted to sleep with me.
I'd feel used if someone pretended one to get to the other. (Unlikely as the reverse of what happened this time might seem, I have actually had it happen to me. Though not via a Ben or a Tom.)
And all of what
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:24 pm (UTC)*grin*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:27 pm (UTC)Yes, that's a good point. I'm not sure how swiftly he mooched off once he figured out he was out of luck, but I'd agree with you on this one... chatting for a bit longer would be polite. And, in this case, might have left him a good chance for the future too, judging by what
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:32 pm (UTC)(of course, all this is notwithstanding the fact that I'm now deeply unlikely to sleep with anyone I'm not in a relationship with anyway)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:37 pm (UTC)Him : Blah blah blah, want to have sex?
Me : Er, I can't, stuff, things, wish I could, [things which required explanation] -
DJ : 'Gorgeous', Turbulent Soundscape.
Me : I'm sorry, I really have to dance to this. I'll explain when I get back.
Him : OK, I could already see you loved this song. I'll be here when it's finished.
So I ran off, then when it was over I squeaked at you and then ran back, and he wasn't there, and I went and found him and said "Hey" and he turned away from me and wandered off. I tried talking to him twice after that (when he was alone) and he did the same. Sorry, but I call that downright nasty.
I realise it may have been partly my fault for running off to dance but it wasn't as if I just bolted, and he did say he'd be there when I got back.
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 03:54 pm (UTC)I realise I'm in a minority by being someone who'd *rather* know all about someone they find attractive than sleep with them, but I still don't like someone saying they want to know "all about me" when all they actually want to know is "yes or no"?
~shrug~
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:08 pm (UTC)Tis an odd turn of phrase to use if all you're actually doing is the polite preamble to 'wanna shag?', yes. If he's not careful, the lad could end up with stalkers boiling his pets (or his balls) for him...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:10 pm (UTC)I suspect he may have been drunk, or perhaps slightly worse. But you know I never notice that.
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:10 pm (UTC)Well yes, I'd agree. You didn't mention it was that blatant when you told me he didn't seem interested in talking any more.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:13 pm (UTC)Oh dear. That made no sense, I need to sleep.
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:13 pm (UTC)I was about to answer "He can't have been, not and still do that contact juggling stuff", and then I remembered the state I was in when I was juggling at Whitby :-\
Yes, he did look a bit cheerful... could be. Or he could just be a bit lacking in actual charm to back up the apparent charm he obviously has.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:13 pm (UTC)Also, you mentioned in a comment elsethread that shortly after he mentioned being interested in sex with you, you ran off to dance. That's something that I do when someone is being more interested than I'd like, so it's quite possible that he assumed you were doing the same, and that put his defences up?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:18 pm (UTC)Benperson who isn't honest!~sigh~
I didn't believe interesting people had 'lines' - I thought that was just for people without the wit to come up with anything original. Because people don't chat me up, I guess. I just don't have the words for how depressed this thread has made me.
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:30 pm (UTC)I didn't believe interesting people had 'lines'
Heck, I have lines. Don't use them very often, but I have them.
Um. And drawing the obvious conclusion from that will get you pouted at...
I've been telling myself I was about to go to bed for the past three comments. I really am going to now...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:30 pm (UTC)I don't actually do chatup lines. At all. It's all done by some magical process of social osmosis.
As I get older and
more past itwiser, I have taken to actually telling people I fancy them incredibly. This works surprisingly well. Well, it would have surprised a much younger me. Oh, the people I wish I'd told, way back when ...(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:32 pm (UTC)Sleep well.
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:36 pm (UTC)And sometimes if you fancy someone it's easy to just say 'wanna fuck' and get it out of your system before it starts to get any deeper into you.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:40 pm (UTC)This can take years of practice.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:46 pm (UTC)Well, he's kinda cute, but that doesn't mean he's actually going to be interesting to hold a conversation with. As proved, or at least strongly suggested, by his behaviour on Friday.
Because people don't chat me up, I guess.
Um. What was he doing then? :)
You may wish to try and develop a slightly thicker skin about being approached by people who lack key social skills in this area... it's likely to happen more often as you grow more confident and look more approachable.
*huggles* Miss you *kiss*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:48 pm (UTC)Or, y'know, Ben.Heck, I need a thicker skin to deal with everything.
Whatever. Lots and lots of whatever. And lots.
But I miss you, too.
E.
x
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:49 pm (UTC)Presentable young man: "Hello!"
Me: "Hi. Nice tits!" (He was wearing a bra with water-filled condoms.)
PYM: "Why, thank you!"
*kiss*
PYM: "Would you like to find a cubicle upstairs?"
Me: "Sounds good to me!"
That was being picked up rather than picking up, but certainly counts as my most successful use of verbal appreciation of a bodily part.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 04:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 05:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-08 11:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-09 12:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-09 01:43 am (UTC)I like it when people express some genuine interest in me as a person, even if they are looking for sex. The two are not mutually exclusive- personally I like to know who I am shagging! If they are only going to fake it, there seems little point, because I can normally tell. In those cases I guess I'd prefer "fancy a shag?" rather than a load of bullshit.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-09 02:16 am (UTC)'Hello, you're cute, what's your name?' is generally pretty successful, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-09 02:31 am (UTC)so "do you want a fuck" would get a big "fuck off!" or "go fuck yourself" in reply....
whereas after talking a while, then i'd probably cope with the question, and respond according to how well i got on with them etc etc.
If they were just after sex it'd be fairly obvious from their manner anyway, and and them going off to chat up someone else after would generally be more amuzing (and flattering that they'd talked to me first) than anything negative...
:)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-06-09 02:32 am (UTC)I'm not entirely sure what that implies - I think it means that I'm very unlikely to sleep with a man I don't know very well, whereas my attraction to women tends to be more directly physical. Plus, like virtually every other bi woman I know, I need more same-sex sex. :)