Oooh, pretty!
Mar. 9th, 2003 08:28 pmGot fed up with waiting for the Cyberdog pics to arrive (yes, I am remarkably impatient), so decided to see if I could get any kind of useful pic out of my own 'happy snaps' quality digicam. This one was the best of the bunch for giving an idea of how pretty they might be to watch...

Update: decided to make a user icon out of the pic, as you may have noticed.
Update: took a couple of work-safe pics showing the strobe setting on the programmable ball...



Update: decided to make a user icon out of the pic, as you may have noticed.
Update: took a couple of work-safe pics showing the strobe setting on the programmable ball...


(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 02:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 02:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 02:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 02:38 am (UTC)Do malnutrition porn viewers like to see swallowing or not? I think it would be good to watch, but surely the very act of swallowing ANYTHING detracts from the nature of the porn?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 03:35 am (UTC)And also because i've never seen any "malnutrition porn", although to be fair it's more very-thin-ness rather than actual malnutrition.
If i make the analogy with blood, to me the swallowing of that with very-thin-ness would be a good thing rather than a bad thing, because there are then various power/dependency elements that come into play (oh the innuendo that could drop out of that phrase). Which is kind of the root of the very-thin-people thing anyway.
*eyes go blurry in mirror*
Alright, i'm going to stop analysing the more weird bits of me now, because i'm scared and have to go do some work anyway.
I would like to point out that
a) I am also attracted to people who aren't wastingly thin, well obviously, most of my past and present partners aren't.
b) No i wouldn't do anything nonconsensual, safewords etc etc
c) No i wouldn't drink more than a very small amount at once and never from anybody i don't know the HIV status of.
d) I wouldn't make anybody starve themselves.
Okay i think that's most bases covered.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 03:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 03:57 am (UTC)I wasn't exclusively talking about fellatio, but this is Den's page, so I can why that may "have gone without saying"!
The comment was aimed at seeing the peristalsis of any fluid, but hey, you opened a much more interesting can 'o worms!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 04:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-10 04:01 am (UTC)Hang on....is this not the "New Medical Methods" newsgroup?