denny: Photo of my face in profile - looking to the right (*smile*)
[personal profile] denny
Okay, so I've been getting a LOT of spam lately with the general subject matter of increasing the volume of male ejaculations. Most of it has the quoted subject line, although there are variations. This has come (ho, ho) as something of a surprise to me, as it was something that had never really occurred to me as a potential area for personal development. I do know one or two girls who really like cum - they like facials, swallowing, etc etc, and okay, the more the better to them I'm sure. However, I also know one or two girls who really don't like the stuff much, and would be perfectly happy if it there was a lot less of it. These exceptional fringe cases aside, I would have guessed that the vast majority of people I know actually couldn't care less... but maybe I'm wrong! And so, a LiveJournal poll was born:



[Poll #424190]

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-24 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] djlongfella.livejournal.com
LMAO....Only you....

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-24 11:45 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-24 11:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hilarityallen.livejournal.com
It's the new big thing! Cialis and Rolex have been almost entirely displaced by larger ejaculation volume and losing those thighs! I happen to be quite attached to my thighs, you know.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-25 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lzz.livejournal.com
For some reason I totally failed to read the phrase "and losing those thighs" at first glance, which meant I was really struggling to try and get it to make any sense...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-28 09:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drswirly.livejournal.com
Maybe "greater volume" doesn't refer to quantity but to noise level. That would finally explain the "thundering sound", Lzz!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-25 01:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fellcat.livejournal.com
Do you wish for greater volume in your ejaculations?

I'm pretty sure it's Not applicable, but I may be wrong.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-25 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
Interpretation of questions is entirely at the discretion of those answering them... it adds another level of interest to the whole thing :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-26 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fellcat.livejournal.com
It's more that I'm not sure whether or not I can ejaculate. However I'm pretty sure that, even if I can't, I'm not missing anything that would make my sex life better.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-26 11:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] djlongfella.livejournal.com
Ok so I know spam is spam...But I did see an article in a not so credible journal that pops through my door in plain cover on a monthly basis...
I was going to ask if any of these pills potions and bonzarie bible bashings actually work, but I presume the spam is more about harvesting active e_mail address's.

But like I say, I saw an article in said 10 x 6 " colour glossy wipe clean publication " and was wondering if their is substaciation to certain food groups / vits + mins producing the " desired " effect.

I know a couple of guys and gals in the porn film industry and remember being party to a convo re " eat this to make it taste better " so I presumme obviously that some food groups increase volume...?

Factual evidence anyone... ? The relvance to my question and the fact I am down to emulsion my ceilings next week is coincidental only..honest

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 2930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags