Yeah, this is why I really don't like the phrasings used for the relationship mappings on LJ6... "had sex with" would be great, it's flexible enough to cover a range of things, whereas "shagged" is a fairly tight (sorry!) definition. Likewise 'has beaten' would cover more than 'spanked', although it's possibly atypical to do (a) without having ever done (b) in that case. I know the phrasings chosen are more fun, but they don't allow room for reasonable and flexible interpretation.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
denny![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 03:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 03:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 06:59 am (UTC)I did make alternative suggestions in the comment you replied to - the problem is they don't sound as 'fun' as the ones you have in place...