Mmm, technology...

[denny]

http://www.thebunnysystem.com/?stripID=bunnies41 :-D

In other news, exitwound's party was mostly a success I think... there was near-naked not-homoerotic-at-all baby-oil wrestling, as well as the usual selection of drunkeness, debauchery, fire-wielding maniacs and air guitar.

It seems that driving to Cheltenham and back costs me in the region of 80 quid each time I do it. I may have to give some thought to not booting the car away from junctions quite so exuberantly.

Sleepydennybednow.

Comments

RXs

[samoth.livejournal.com]

If your 7 is anything like my 8, then booting away from junctions doesn't make *that* much of a difference to the dire fuel economy :) Although I find doing the motorway bits at 70ish rather than 90is makes quite a big difference to how far I get out of a tankful.

Anyhow, booting it out of junctions, or especially round roundabouts is a good chunk of the point of having the batmobile! :)

Re: RXs

[stuartl.livejournal.com]

The 8 is a new design of engine and presumably engine management systems. I wouldn't be surprised if there were relatively significant differences in fuel consumption patterns between the two generations.

And, from memory, dennyd has changed significant things about the Batmobile, which have probably trashed his fuel consumption :)

Re: RXs

[dennyd.livejournal.com]

It's been ported, but that's not really being used yet as the ECU, intake and exhaust systems are all still standard. My ever-decreasing fuel efficiency is almost certainly a function of my increasing enthusiasm for the higher end of the rev counter :)

The 8 has the bizarre characteristic of being more fuel efficient at higher revs, at least in the higher gears... the engine management software for the 8 is quite convoluted it seems.

[zellah.livejournal.com]

You were ASBO boi.

Stunning.

[libellum.livejournal.com]

I suspected the bunnies would appeal ;)

And ... baby oil wrestling!! I hope there were pictures :P

[flannelcat.livejournal.com]

Yes. There were. And I fully intend to vet them, before they go online. *Facepalm*

Note to self: Take jewellery off first - I have a scratch along my throat where hamsterhotep had his forearm in my neck / necklace.

And no. Not homoerotic at all. :P

[dylan.livejournal.com]

I have some pretty funny ones, I'll have to weed out the ones with extra-testicular activity before I post them up though

[blaadyblah.livejournal.com]

You so deserve a medal for your selfless heroism in preserving those images for the pervs posterity. :o)

[dylan.livejournal.com]

At least it wasn't my lens I was risking ;)

[blaadyblah.livejournal.com]

Heaven forbid! ;)

[dylan.livejournal.com]

Why risk damaging my £50 lens when I can borrow Rik's £625 one? No wait...

[dylan.livejournal.com]

Vet them? If I could find a vet I'd have them put down.

Piccies at my lj