It's my favourite book... I thought the days when a book could grab me that hard were lost to my teenage years, until I bought Snowcrash. I was up all night turning the pages, despite having to be up early for a training course :)
So women are meant to just walk around wearing these things all the time just in case they get raped? I can hardly imagine a scenario where the rapist will stop to let her insert it.
the words Toxic Shock syndrome come to mind.... oh and how exactly would the woman get it out when they didn't want it in??? nice idea but not for real, surely... i liked the harpoony idea too.
I thought "Jack Rolling" was all the rage in SA - and if you have dragged her off the street and back to your den then you have plenty of time to take care of such countermeasures.
and like they mention on the article - it is likely to enrage the attacker further resulting in an even worse attack.
Hadn't heard that phrase before, but the meaning is obvious enough. Yeah, that would seem to be a problem, as are the other points. Still, it's an interesting idea.
Its been mentioned a lot in articles relating to that gang in Northampton.
Zoo (mens weekly mag) had a good point to make - if women walk down the road on the side facing traffic then no one can sneek up on them in cars... to quote the mag "Women in South Africa wouldnt dare do anything different"
I am guessing the device isnt superglued in - so now that the world knows they exist - one assumes that the attacker would make an attempt to check....
...would rather put me off picking up southa african girls in bars - what if they forget they have it in! *clutches groin and winces*
A bit of both, he is all mine!! And I would seriously maim anyone who came on to him..but I am not violent..nope not me, no sir not at all..well not unless I am provoked!
Is it just urban myth that female canines have the ability to do this naturally? I seem to remember that if they are unhappy during *cough* coitus, they sorta 'lock up' and the poor dog is left with one helluva bruised and crushed member...
The male cat's barbed member is due to female cats being what it referred to as 'shock ovulators'. This is why cats do the 'orgy' thing, the first male to mate with the female actually has very little chance of fertilising her, because she doesn't ovulate until after he withdraws, which is when his barbs spike her, it's the second and third participants who are likely to father the kittens.
No, the canine member swells to ridiculous proportions after mating to lock him in thus preventing another male from mating with the female until his sperm have had the oppertunity to 'do their stuff'.
I'm not sure how far down the canine tree this goes, but it's certainly true of wolves.
Oh yes. My dream device would be something of this nature which the wearer could activate just by thinking about it - I fear we are entering the realms of alien sex :(
I think its a bloody stupid idea. I repeat what I said on ev1ldonut's lj:
I think the device is a terrible idea! It happened to me once because I was too afraid to shout or run. If I was so afraid of his power over me, I wouldn't even want to think about how afraid I would be of his anger after being got by something like that. I think it is great that someone is trying to invent something to protect women but i really don't think that this is it. I totally disagree with the statement "He will obviously be too pre-occupied at this stage,I promise you he is going to be too sore. He will go straight to hospital." I very much doubt that. There are no illegal medical practioners that would be happy to do somethign about it for him right?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 10:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 10:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 01:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 03:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 10:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:04 am (UTC)I assume so, yes. From the sound of it, the odds are pretty high where the inventor lives.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 01:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 10:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:07 am (UTC)and like they mention on the article - it is likely to enrage the attacker further resulting in an even worse attack.
make the inventor wear it inside out!
Jack Rolling
Date: 2005-09-02 11:49 am (UTC)Re: Jack Rolling
Date: 2005-09-02 12:06 pm (UTC)Zoo (mens weekly mag) had a good point to make - if women walk down the road on the side facing traffic then no one can sneek up on them in cars... to quote the mag "Women in South Africa wouldnt dare do anything different"
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 12:38 pm (UTC)However the fact that it requires hospital treatment to remove (thus alerting the authorities) may ultimately provide a sort of herd immunity.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 12:43 pm (UTC)...would rather put me off picking up southa african girls in bars - what if they forget they have it in! *clutches groin and winces*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 12:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 01:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 04:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 04:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:47 am (UTC)Perhaps she could market a 'no permanent damage' version?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 12:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 01:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 01:35 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how far down the canine tree this goes, but it's certainly true of wolves.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 02:03 pm (UTC)I blame David Attenborough!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 11:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 01:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 06:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 01:44 pm (UTC)I think the device is a terrible idea!
It happened to me once because I was too afraid to shout or run. If I was so afraid of his power over me, I wouldn't even want to think about how afraid I would be of his anger after being got by something like that.
I think it is great that someone is trying to invent something to protect women but i really don't think that this is it.
I totally disagree with the statement "He will obviously be too pre-occupied at this stage,I promise you he is going to be too sore. He will go straight to hospital." I very much doubt that. There are no illegal medical practioners that would be happy to do somethign about it for him right?