(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
Quite the selection :) Ta.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
Neil Stephenson got there first; see the "dentata" in Snowcrash

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
It's my favourite book... I thought the days when a book could grab me that hard were lost to my teenage years, until I bought Snowcrash. I was up all night turning the pages, despite having to be up early for a training course :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libellum.livejournal.com
So women are meant to just walk around wearing these things all the time just in case they get raped? I can hardly imagine a scenario where the rapist will stop to let her insert it.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
So women are meant to just walk around wearing these things all the time just in case they get raped?

I assume so, yes. From the sound of it, the odds are pretty high where the inventor lives.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altered-state.livejournal.com
the words Toxic Shock syndrome come to mind.... oh and how exactly would the woman get it out when they didn't want it in??? nice idea but not for real, surely... i liked the harpoony idea too.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 01:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sepheri.livejournal.com
TSS is caused by bacteria that latex cannot support

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 10:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mejoff.livejournal.com
Dentata?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lovelyoliver.livejournal.com
sounds like a very south african product from the same stable as the in-car flamethrower to thwart carjackers.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
I so need one of those. Not so much to deter carjackers, but to outdo the boy racers with glow-kits under their cars :-D

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grandwazooo.livejournal.com
I thought "Jack Rolling" was all the rage in SA - and if you have dragged her off the street and back to your den then you have plenty of time to take care of such countermeasures.

and like they mention on the article - it is likely to enrage the attacker further resulting in an even worse attack.

make the inventor wear it inside out!

Jack Rolling

Date: 2005-09-02 11:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
Hadn't heard that phrase before, but the meaning is obvious enough. Yeah, that would seem to be a problem, as are the other points. Still, it's an interesting idea.

Re: Jack Rolling

Date: 2005-09-02 12:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grandwazooo.livejournal.com
Its been mentioned a lot in articles relating to that gang in Northampton.

Zoo (mens weekly mag) had a good point to make - if women walk down the road on the side facing traffic then no one can sneek up on them in cars... to quote the mag "Women in South Africa wouldnt dare do anything different"

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deliberateblank.livejournal.com
it is likely to enrage the attacker further resulting in an even worse attack

However the fact that it requires hospital treatment to remove (thus alerting the authorities) may ultimately provide a sort of herd immunity.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grandwazooo.livejournal.com
I am guessing the device isnt superglued in - so now that the world knows they exist - one assumes that the attacker would make an attempt to check....

...would rather put me off picking up southa african girls in bars - what if they forget they have it in! *clutches groin and winces*

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
Dude, I've met your girlfriend. If you go picking up any nationality of girls in bars you'll be clutching your groin and wincing :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 01:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grandwazooo.livejournal.com
... you may have a point there... :P

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kagero.livejournal.com
You make me sound so violent.....but yeah I would rip his nuts off if he went out picking up girls :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
Not violent, of course not... just um, territorial, right? :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kagero.livejournal.com
A bit of both, he is all mine!! And I would seriously maim anyone who came on to him..but I am not violent..nope not me, no sir not at all..well not unless I am provoked!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ergotia.livejournal.com
As a female domme I am intrigued by uses other then the anti rape one....

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
I think "requires surgery to remove" goes beyond most people's idea of a fun toy...

Perhaps she could market a 'no permanent damage' version?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nullstr.livejournal.com
Is it just urban myth that female canines have the ability to do this naturally? I seem to remember that if they are unhappy during *cough* coitus, they sorta 'lock up' and the poor dog is left with one helluva bruised and crushed member...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grandwazooo.livejournal.com
I heard it was male cats with the barbed {rooster} to stop the female running away....

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mejoff.livejournal.com
The male cat's barbed member is due to female cats being what it referred to as 'shock ovulators'. This is why cats do the 'orgy' thing, the first male to mate with the female actually has very little chance of fertilising her, because she doesn't ovulate until after he withdraws, which is when his barbs spike her, it's the second and third participants who are likely to father the kittens.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mejoff.livejournal.com
No, the canine member swells to ridiculous proportions after mating to lock him in thus preventing another male from mating with the female until his sperm have had the oppertunity to 'do their stuff'.

I'm not sure how far down the canine tree this goes, but it's certainly true of wolves.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mejoff.livejournal.com
Shit! I know faaaaar too much about animal amting for someone who hasn't done biology since GCSE!
I blame David Attenborough!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ergotia.livejournal.com
Yeah would need slight modification :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 01:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamfracture.livejournal.com
I don't know whether to be alarmed or intrigued. I suspect it would need significant modification, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ergotia.livejournal.com
Oh yes. My dream device would be something of this nature which the wearer could activate just by thinking about it - I fear we are entering the realms of alien sex :(

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-02 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sepheri.livejournal.com
I think its a bloody stupid idea. I repeat what I said on [livejournal.com profile] ev1ldonut's lj:

I think the device is a terrible idea!
It happened to me once because I was too afraid to shout or run. If I was so afraid of his power over me, I wouldn't even want to think about how afraid I would be of his anger after being got by something like that.
I think it is great that someone is trying to invent something to protect women but i really don't think that this is it.
I totally disagree with the statement "He will obviously be too pre-occupied at this stage,I promise you he is going to be too sore. He will go straight to hospital." I very much doubt that. There are no illegal medical practioners that would be happy to do somethign about it for him right?

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 2930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags