The article appears to be written from the PoV of a heterosexual female. As far as I can see, it doesn't make any claims that there aren't an equivalent set of benefits to be found for guys by choosing geeky girls - it's just not what that article is about...
more to the point, it seems to be written for American, hip, heterosexual, high-school age girls who otherwise would be going out with jocks. taking into account those limitations I didn't really expect it not to be offensively over-stereotyped. There was a certain amount of irony in my comment, but I wanted to make it anyway :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 12:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 12:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 01:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 01:26 pm (UTC)also in these icons, we appear to have the same smirk. weird.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 01:53 pm (UTC)< denny > karma geeky girls
< dipsy > geeky girls has neutral karma
< denny > (geeky girls)++
< denny > karma geeky girls
< dipsy > geeky girls has karma of 1
smirks++ :)
As I recall, I was in a very predatory mood when this picture was taken... what's your excuse? :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 04:44 pm (UTC)my excuse? It's intended as wry and playful. I was a bit tipsy. Does it look predatory?! Eek!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 07:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 08:05 pm (UTC)I'd be very worried if I looked predatory! I had someone teasingly call me "ma'am" on LJ earlier today, which was a bit of a shock! Reallyno...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 01:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 01:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 01:09 pm (UTC)Lady geeks, I think, would be good girlfriends too.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 02:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 02:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-27 07:56 pm (UTC)