While it may be difficult getting compensation for anything other than legal fees, I believe he does have a case under the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 regarding the initial adding of his address without opt in, and failure of them to remove it when requested.
Also, although I've not looked further into it, I suspect that companies using another companies services for advertising in this manner can be held responsible for their agent's actions on their behalf (the sending of the spam advertising their products or services).
However, to add to what I said at the start, I suspect that the reward for Denny will be less financial, more emotional...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-17 12:39 am (UTC)Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 regarding the initial adding of his address without opt in, and failure of them to remove it when requested.
Also, although I've not looked further into it, I suspect that companies using another companies services for advertising in this manner can be held responsible for their agent's actions on their behalf (the sending of the spam advertising their products or services).
However, to add to what I said at the start, I suspect that the reward for Denny will be less financial, more emotional...