Two articles just out on this...
The first: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/05/ntesco05.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/12/05/ixhome.html
"The MPs suggested that loyalty cards could be used to identify customers who bought excessive amounts of foods high in fat, sugar and salt, and asked whether supermarkets could use this information to promote healthier alternatives to these customers."
The second: http://media.guardian.co.uk/advertising/story/0,7492,1099981,00.html
"David Hinchliffe, the MP who was instrumental in securing a ban on tobacco advertising earlier this year, suggested supermarkets' loyalty cards could be used to monitor eating habits."
(spotted on Politech)
The first: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/05/ntesco05.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/12/05/ixhome.html
"The MPs suggested that loyalty cards could be used to identify customers who bought excessive amounts of foods high in fat, sugar and salt, and asked whether supermarkets could use this information to promote healthier alternatives to these customers."
The second: http://media.guardian.co.uk/advertising/story/0,7492,1099981,00.html
"David Hinchliffe, the MP who was instrumental in securing a ban on tobacco advertising earlier this year, suggested supermarkets' loyalty cards could be used to monitor eating habits."
(spotted on Politech)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-05 07:21 am (UTC)I'm not sure there'd be much of a profit in it for supermarkets to try to encourage people who buy unhealthy, expensive pre-prep foods to switch to lower-fat or lower-salt foods, which usually means buying cheap, fresh produce and cooking your own. If the Government did try to force their hand, it would probably result, at least in the short term, in the price of healthier food being pushed up as they try to preserve their profit margins.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-05 07:25 am (UTC)And, is it possible to section governments under the mental health act? :)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-05 07:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-05 08:13 am (UTC)That's a very good point. It's kind of sad that the most likely thing to defeat this kind of government invasion of privacy is a pragmatic money motive, but hey - whatever works :)