[identity profile] twinkle-lfs.livejournal.com 2007-10-25 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
....but having said that, YouTube's wording might be a bit different, but the terms of use say almost exactly the same thing.

[identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com 2007-10-25 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Not quite - I can revoke their license by deleting the video. Your conditions say 'permanent'.

Other than that, yes, they're just as unreasonable - but that single difference means that I can do something about it if they actually do exploit their unreasonable 'rights'.

The odds are no website is going to make unreasonable use of my content, I'm not that interesting :) but handing over all control of it is just a silly thing to do.

[identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com 2007-10-25 01:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, re-reading, they also only include 'other media' for purposes of advertising and promotion - they're don't seem to have allowed themselves to (for instance) make a TV show of their favourite user-submitted clips.

They don't seem to have edit/modify rights either, although they do have derivative works.