ext_287016: (Default)
pooloftrees ([identity profile] pooloftrees.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] denny 2008-04-11 02:21 pm (UTC)

I totally agree - machines might be able to help provide the result quicker, but there should be random external auditing of the machines used or a polling stations results, and a printed paper record to post into the traditional ballot box to allow manual recounts and comparison in case of any doubts or a close run election.

Also, there needs to be a well defined support network in case individuals have any complaints, or polling stations experience problems.

Personally, despite being a geek, I feel happy sticking to the existing paper system overall.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org