ext_2941 ([identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] denny 2005-11-03 11:41 am (UTC)

Surely this legislation is about what is portrayed, not how it was produced? So they don't care whether it's real bestiality, or fantastically realistic CGI. I'm curious to know what representations people think should be inherently illegal, not what real performances should not be allowed.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org